README: Fix wrong terminology#79
Open
Kreyren wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Conversation
By using "Open-source" you are implying that this design is not complying with GPLv3 meaning that it restricts the right to use, study, improve and share.
This replaces the wrong terminology with the terminology used by Free Software Foundation ("FSF").
NOTE: FSF is not using the term `Technoliberal` (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technoliberalism), it's used in the EU politics to clarify that "Free Software" is not "Socialist Software" as people get confused with the understanding of "Free" as in Freedom instead of "Gratis".
NOTE: FSF uses the term `Free Hardware Designs` instead of `Free Hardware` to make the term more understandable by the public [https://gnu.org/philosophy/free-hardware-designs.html]
Author
|
CC @maxim-xyz |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
By using "Open-source" you are implying that this design is not complying with GPLv3 meaning that it restricts the right to use, study, improve and share.
This replaces the wrong terminology with the terminology used by Free Software Foundation ("FSF").
NOTE: FSF is not using the term
Technoliberal(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technoliberalism), it's used in the EU politics to clarify that "Free Software" is not "Socialist Software" as people get confused with the understanding of "Free" as in Freedom instead of "Gratis".NOTE: FSF uses the term
Free Hardware Designsinstead ofFree Hardwareto make the term more understandable by the public [https://gnu.org/philosophy/free-hardware-designs.html]