Skip to content

chore: address the fqcn[action-core] ansible-lint rule - #64

Merged
LukoJy3D merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
hex/daily-improvement-2026-08-04
Aug 10, 2026
Merged

chore: address the fqcn[action-core] ansible-lint rule #64
LukoJy3D merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
hex/daily-improvement-2026-08-04

Conversation

@hex-botas

@hex-botas hex-botas Bot commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Request

Daily code improvement: find one small, low-risk, self-contained consistency fix (max 10 instances).

Summary

  • Refactor
    • Bare builtin module names in the handlers and the compatibility-variables task file now use their fully qualified ansible.builtin.* names, matching the convention already used in tasks/main.yml.

Implementation

Renames only — 6 instances across 2 files, no logic, argument, or handler-name changes:

  • handlers/main.ymlsystemdansible.builtin.systemd, serviceansible.builtin.service
  • tasks/compatibility-variables.ymldebugansible.builtin.debug, and 3× set_factansible.builtin.set_fact

This addresses the fqcn[action-core] ansible-lint rule (ansible-lint>=6.0 is in requirements.txt). tasks/compatibility-variables.yml was internally inconsistent — one task already used ansible.builtin.set_fact while its neighbours were bare; both files are now fully qualified.

Handler names (reload systemd configuration, restart elasticsearch) are untouched, so all notify: references keep working. Remaining bare-module files are intentionally left for follow-up PRs to keep this diff small.


Generated by DEX CODE
Triggered by agent:weekly-code-improvements

@hex-botas
hex-botas Bot requested a review from a team as a code owner August 4, 2026 05:01
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

You’ve reached a temporary PR review limit under our Fair Usage Limits Policy.

Your recent review volume is higher than typical usage, so adaptive limits are currently applied.

Next review available in: 14 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: c8c745bd-349c-4c4c-aea2-b49c7c99a1eb

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ab283a0 and a088819.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • handlers/main.yml
  • tasks/compatibility-variables.yml

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@LukoJy3D LukoJy3D changed the title Daily code improvement (2026-08-04) chore: address the fqcn[action-core] ansible-lint rule Aug 10, 2026
@LukoJy3D
LukoJy3D merged commit b210c28 into main Aug 10, 2026
7 checks passed
@LukoJy3D
LukoJy3D deleted the hex/daily-improvement-2026-08-04 branch August 10, 2026 07:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant